One reliable picture, from your own systems
Every figure, traced back to the system it came from.
| System | Entities | Observed | Normalised | Held back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP S/4HANA | Acme US, Acme US Ops, Acme NL | 8666 | 99.2% | 8 |
| NetSuite | Acme UK, Acme Asia | 11030 | 99.5% | 12 |
| Dynamics 365 Business Central | Acme Ireland, Acme Capital | 8181 | 99.3% | 22 |
| Coupa | Acme US, Acme NL, Acme DE | 8645 | 99.3% | 7 |
| Avalara | Acme US, Acme NL, Acme DE | 9711 | 99.7% | 8 |
| Workday | Acme Group, Acme US, Acme UK | 8512 | 99.5% | 11 |
| J.P. Morgan Access | Acme US, Acme US Ops, Acme Capital | 11353 | 99.5% | 9 |
| CitiDirect | Acme NL, Acme DE, Acme Ireland | 8620 | 99.5% | 12 |
| HSBCnet | Acme Group, Acme UK, Acme Asia | 10127 | 99.5% | 7 |
| Emirates NBD businessONLINE | Acme UAE | 6590 | 99.2% | 8 |
| Stripe | Acme US, Acme UK, Acme Asia | 5270 | 99.4% | 6 |
| Kyriba | Acme Group, Acme Ireland | 9219 | 99.5% | 12 |
Three questions, three surfaces. Not one crowded dashboard.
A CFO, an analyst and an operator are asking different things of the same records. Forcing all three onto one screen is how a financial view ends up serving none of them.
What is happening financially? The position, the movement against the prior period and the exposure that needs a decision. A summary, labelled as one — every figure carries how confident the platform is in it and how recently its source confirmed it.
Which counterparties carry the open balance?
Show the figures as a table
| Bucket | Amount | Items |
|---|---|---|
| Meridian | $1,372,055.10 | 5 |
| Sable | $1,023,497.76 | 4 |
| Kestrel | $957,185.27 | 5 |
| Ironwood | $717,100.00 | 3 |
| Northgate | $628,530.40 | 2 |
| Cobalt | $499,450.00 | 4 |
| Counterparty | Open | Items | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Industrial Systems GmbH | $1.4M | 5 | 20.8% |
| Sable Marketing Collective | $1.0M | 4 | 15.5% |
| Kestrel Cloud Infrastructure Inc. | $957K | 5 | 14.5% |
| Ironwood Construction Partners | $717K | 3 | 10.9% |
| Northgate Professional Services | $629K | 2 | 9.5% |
| Cobalt Logistics Group | $499K | 4 | 7.6% |
484713 objects observed across 10 reading connections · 99.5% normalised · 122 quarantined and 460 skipped rather than coerced into the model.
| Class | Count | Exposure | Oldest |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUARANTINED | 8 | $2.2M | 357h |
| REJECTED | 2 | $183K | 100h |
| FAILED | 2 | $0 | 31h |
| SKIPPED | 1 | $0 | 74h |
| CONFLICTING | 15 | $2.3M | 648h |
| UNKNOWN | 4 | $497K | 238h |
An answer that shows its working — and says when it is guessing.
An investigation identifies the period, compares the records, surfaces the movements that contributed and explains the variance. What it must also do is draw the line between what the records establish and what it is inferring.
A platform that cannot say “I am not certain” should not be trusted with the sentence before it. That boundary is a product property here, not a disclaimer in a footer.
The requested amount ($30,000.00) is not the amount that was authorized ($3,000.00).
- The approval is valid and in scope
- The destination, entity and provider all match the authorization
- No funds left the account — the instruction was never submitted
- How the requested amount came to differ from the authorization — the preparing session is under review
- Entity
- Acme UAE
- Exposure
- $3,000
- Open for
- 4d ago
- Blocking
- Settlement of the invoice · Vendor payment term compliance
- Waiting on
- Finance Operations to re-prepare the instruction at the authorized amount
The whole chain, including the links that are not there.
Counterparty, commitment, obligation, authority, integrity, movement, reconciliation, books, evidence. A stage with nothing in it says so and says why — because a lineage view that quietly omits its gaps is how a reader concludes a chain is complete when it is not.
Everything downstream reads from here.
Operate coordinates work against this model, Govern decides on it, Reconcile checks against it and Ledger posts from it. A figure nobody can trace is a figure nothing else should act on.
Connected sources
ERP, bank and provider records ingested without altering what the source said.
Normalisation
Provider formats mapped deterministically into one canonical model. No value is invented to fill a gap.
Entity resolution
The counterparty a source names, matched to the entity it refers to — or left explicitly unresolved rather than guessed.
Financial context
How a document, a payment, an account and a counterparty relate, with the evidence for each link.
Confidence and freshness
Known, derived, conflicting or missing — and how recently the source confirmed it.
Exceptions
What could not be established, kept visible instead of averaged away.
Bring your financial operations into one intelligent system.
Connect the ERPs, banks and providers you already run, establish one view of financial reality across them, and govern, reconcile and prove the work on top.
Onboarding is sales-led with company verification — there is no anonymous signup.